Will v. Sinkwitz

39 Cal. 570
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1870
DocketNo. 2,435
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 39 Cal. 570 (Will v. Sinkwitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Will v. Sinkwitz, 39 Cal. 570 (Cal. 1870).

Opinion

Wallace, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court

The judgment rendered by the County Court was void, because beyond the jurisdiction of that Court to render upon appeal.

A writ of certiorari having been issued by the District Court, by which this judgment was brought up for review, that Court entered an order modifying the judgment of the County Court, and ordering that it be reduced to a named sum, which would be within the jurisdiction of the County Court.

The District Court should have set aside the judgment of the County Court as void for want of jurisdiction. Its validity in point of jurisdiction, in form and amount, as it Avas entered by the County Court, was the only question before the District Court upon the return of the writ of certiorari, and that Court had no authority to modify or reduce it in amount or otherwise.

The order is reversed and cause remanded, with directions to enter an order vacating the judgment of the County Court in accordance with the prayer of the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Redlands High School District v. Superior Court
125 P.2d 490 (California Supreme Court, 1942)
Petersen v. Civil Service Board
227 P. 238 (California Court of Appeal, 1924)
Central Pacific Railroad v. Board of Equalization of Placer County
46 Cal. 667 (California Supreme Court, 1873)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Cal. 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/will-v-sinkwitz-cal-1870.