WILL-ED ENTERPRISES, INC. v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority

229 S.E.2d 763, 139 Ga. App. 829, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2013
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 22, 1976·No. 52625·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Webb, Judge.

Condemnee in this condemnation proceeding enumerates as the sole error the trial court’s refusal to admit in evidence a contingent and unconsummated contract for the sale of the property entered into approximately two months before the date of taking. No error appears since at the time the contract was entered into the property had been renovated and was in good condition, while at the subsequent date of taking it had been vandalized and was unrentable. "Since the compensation to be paid for property condemned is to be determined by its value at the time of its actual taking, a jury can not consider the value at a time prior to the actual time of taking.” City of Atlanta v. West, 123 Ga. App. 255 (1) (180 SE2d 277) (1971).

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WILL-ED ENTERPRISES, INC. v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, 229 S.E.2d 763, 139 Ga. App. 829, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2013 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

229 S.E.2d 763 (WILL-ED ENTERPRISES, INC. v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shealy v. UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKE
537 S.E.2d 105 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
Department of Transportation v. Petkas
377 S.E.2d 166 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)
Collins v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
291 S.E.2d 742 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)