Wilkus v. Prudential Insurance
This text of 236 A.D. 740 (Wilkus v. Prudential Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Judgment and order of the City Court of Yonkers reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of evidence on the question of a fraudulently obtained compromise, and that it was error on the part of the court to exclude the evidence offered by defendant as to the fraud of the insured in the application for the policy. (Telford v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 223 App. Div. 175, 181; affd., 250 N. Y. 528.) (See, also, Pimpinello v. Swift & Co., 253 N. Y. 159,162.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 A.D. 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkus-v-prudential-insurance-nyappdiv-1932.