Wilko Corp. v. Harrison

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Wilko Corp. v. Harrison

124 S.E.2d 872, 256 N.C. 708, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 528

DecidedApril 11, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 124 S.E.2d 872 (Wilko Corp. v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilko Corp. v. Harrison, 124 S.E.2d 872, 256 N.C. 708, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 528 (N.C. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only eyewitnesses to the accident were the two drivers. Their testimony was conflicting. The court reviewed the evidence, explained the law arising thereon, and gave proper instructions as to the burden of proof on each of the issues. Nothing in the record indicates the jury could have been confused or misled. The case involved a simple question: Which driver crossed over into the other’s traffic lane, thus causing the collision? The jury resolved the conflict in favor of the defendants. In the record, we find

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The only eyewitnesses to the accident were the two drivers. Their testimony was conflicting. The court reviewed the evidence, explained the law arising thereon, and gave proper instructions as to the burden of proof on each of the issues. Nothing in the record indicates the jury could have been confused or misled. The case involved a simple question: Which driver crossed over into the other’s traffic lane, thus causing the collision? The jury resolved the conflict in favor of the defendants. In the record, we find

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 S.E.2d 872, 256 N.C. 708, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilko-corp-v-harrison-nc-1962.