Wilkinson v. Wilkinson

10 A.D.2d 937, 200 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9667
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 24, 1960·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and the motion for alimony pendente lite and counsel fees in this action for separation is denied, without costs. The separation agreement between the parties cannot be stamped as void upon its face on the ground that it is against public policy and violative of section 51 of the Domestic Relations Law (cf. Dworkin v. Dworkin, 247 App. Div. 213). Nor can its validity be determined on a motion of this nature, upon affidavits which make meager reference to it (Rosenblatt v. Rosenblatt, 209 App. Div. 373; Solomene v. Solomene, 229 App. Div. 728). Accordingly, while the separation agreement exists plaintiff may not secure the temporary relief she seeks. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Yalente and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilkinson v. Wilkinson, 10 A.D.2d 937, 200 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9667 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

10 A.D.2d 937 (Wilkinson v. Wilkinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Breen v. Breen
114 A.D.2d 920 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Gotthainer v. Gotthainer
107 Misc. 2d 221 (NYC Family Court, 1980)
Bennett v. Bennett
56 A.D.2d 782 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)