Wilkinson v. Stettler
This text of 46 Pa. Super. 407 (Wilkinson v. Stettler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are all of opinion that the words alleged to have been used by the vendor at the time of the sale do not import an express warranty of the truth of the representation; and as no circumstances were shown from which the jury [411]*411could legitimately infer that the vendor intended them to be accepted by the vendee as a warranty, the learned trial judge committed no error in entering a compulsory non-suit and refusing to take it off. This conclusion is so well supported by the opinion filed by him and the Pennsylvania decisions therein cited that further discussion by us would be mere repetition.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 Pa. Super. 407, 1911 Pa. Super. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkinson-v-stettler-pasuperct-1911.