Wilkinson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wilkinson v. State

278 S.W.3d 225, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 323, 2009 WL 668732

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 17, 2009

DocketWD 69025

StatusPublished

This text of 278 S.W.3d 225 (Wilkinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilkinson v. State, 278 S.W.3d 225, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 323, 2009 WL 668732 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Anthony W. Wilkinson appeals from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A published opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Anthony W. Wilkinson appeals from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A published opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 S.W.3d 225, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 323, 2009 WL 668732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkinson-v-state-moctapp-2009.