Wilkinson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wilkinson v. State

278 S.W.3d 225, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 323, 2009 WL 668732

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 17, 2009·No. WD 69025·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Anthony W. Wilkinson appeals from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A published opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Anthony W. Wilkinson appeals from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A published opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Wilkinson v. State, 278 S.W.3d 225, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 323, 2009 WL 668732 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

278 S.W.3d 225 (Wilkinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.