Wilkinson v. Murphy
20 Ala. 104
Opinion
A writ of error does not lie to tbe judgment of tbe Court of Probate on tbe bearing of a habeas corpus. Tbe judgment cannot be said to be final, as it is not conclusive on tbe rights of tbe party, who may renew bis application to tbe same, or another tribunal.—Ex parte Campbell, at the present term; or be may obtain tbe aid of this Court, by proceeding according to tbe practice settled in ex parte Croom & May, 19 Ala. Rep. 561.
Tbe writ of error must be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilkinson v. Murphy, 20 Ala. 104 (Ala. 1852).
20 Ala. 104 (Wilkinson v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thornton v. Moore
61 Ala. 347 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1878)
Matthews v. Hobbs
51 Ala. 210 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1874)
Pearson v. Darrington
32 Ala. 227 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1858)