Wilkins v. Swartz
239 F. 1023, 152 C.C.A. 667, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2322
This text of 239 F. 1023 (Wilkins v. Swartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wilkins v. Swartz, 239 F. 1023, 152 C.C.A. 667, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2322 (5th Cir. 1917).
Opinion
We .are of opinion that the action of the trial court in this case in denying the plaintiff’s motion for judgment in his favor was correct. The assignment of that action as error is not sustainable. The judgment under review is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
239 F. 1023, 152 C.C.A. 667, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkins-v-swartz-ca5-1917.