Wilkins v. Swartz

239 F. 1023, 152 C.C.A. 667, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2322
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 21, 1917·No. No. 2952·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We .are of opinion that the action of the trial court in this case in denying the plaintiff’s motion for judgment in his favor was correct. The assignment of that action as error is not sustainable. The judgment under review is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilkins v. Swartz, 239 F. 1023, 152 C.C.A. 667, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2322 (5th Cir. 1917).

239 F. 1023 (Wilkins v. Swartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.