Wilkins v. State

870 S.W.2d 254, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 264
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 15, 1994·No. No. 63991·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We find the motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact which are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2). [255]*255Further, we find no error of law appears, Rule 84.16(b)(5).

An opinion in this case would serve no precedential purpose; therefore, we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilkins v. State, 870 S.W.2d 254, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 264 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

870 S.W.2d 254 (Wilkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.