Wilkins v. Sha'ste, Inc.

4 N.E.3d 1050, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1432
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 12, 2014·No. 2013-1794·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 99167, 2013-Ohio-3527. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

O’Neill, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and Kennedy, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilkins v. Sha'ste, Inc., 4 N.E.3d 1050, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1432 (Ohio 2014).

4 N.E.3d 1050 (Wilkins v. Sha'ste, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilkins v. Sha'ste Inc.
2013 Ohio 3527 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)