Wilkins v. Quarter Sessions of Camden
34 A. 935, 58 N.J.L. 555, 29 Vroom 555, 1896 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 131
Opinion
This certiorari brings up the judgment in a criminal case. The court has been furnished with a copy of the files of the. office of the clerk of the Supreme Court, and nothing more. [556] The case was not argued orally or upon brief. The prosecutor of the writ was neither excused from presenting his cause, nor has he shown any reason for not doing so. In such case the court may, of its own motion, dismiss the writ without looking at the merits or the form in which they are sought to be presented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilkins v. Quarter Sessions of Camden, 34 A. 935, 58 N.J.L. 555, 29 Vroom 555, 1896 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 131 (N.J. 1896).
34 A. 935 (Wilkins v. Quarter Sessions of Camden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Central Improvement Co. v. Cambria Steel Co.
210 F. 696 (Eighth Circuit, 1913)
Potvin v. Denny Hotel Co.
66 P. 376 (Washington Supreme Court, 1901)