Wilkins v. Quarter Sessions of Camden

34 A. 935, 58 N.J.L. 555, 29 Vroom 555, 1896 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 131
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 15, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 34 A. 935 (Wilkins v. Quarter Sessions of Camden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilkins v. Quarter Sessions of Camden, 34 A. 935, 58 N.J.L. 555, 29 Vroom 555, 1896 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 131 (N.J. 1896).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This certiorari brings up the judgment in a criminal case. The court has been furnished with a copy of the files of the. office of the clerk of the Supreme Court, and nothing more. [556]*556The case was not argued orally or upon brief. The prosecutor of the writ was neither excused from presenting his cause, nor has he shown any reason for not doing so. In such case the court may, of its own motion, dismiss the writ without looking at the merits or the form in which they are sought to be presented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Central Improvement Co. v. Cambria Steel Co.
210 F. 696 (Eighth Circuit, 1913)
Potvin v. Denny Hotel Co.
66 P. 376 (Washington Supreme Court, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 A. 935, 58 N.J.L. 555, 29 Vroom 555, 1896 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkins-v-quarter-sessions-of-camden-nj-1896.