Wilkins v. Perez
This text of Wilkins v. Perez (Wilkins v. Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-41140 Summary Calendar
CLARENCE G. WILKINS, JR.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
O. PEREZ ET AL.,
Defendants,
O. PEREZ, Warden; D. MOONEYHAM, Captain; T. LAWRENCE,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-96-CV-230
-------------------- May 10, 2001
Before POLITZ, JONES, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its
own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th
Cir. 1987). Clarence Wilkins, Jr., Texas prisoner # 664542,
appeals from the district court's order dismissing his civil
rights suit for failure to pay the filing fee. However, the
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-41140 - 2 -
notice of appeal was filed more than one year after entry of the
district court's judgment. Because the notice of appeal was not
filed within 30 days of the judgment in accordance with Federal
Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1)(A),. this court lacks
jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. See United States v.
Merrifield, 764 F.2d 436, 437 (5th Cir. 1985) (timely notice of
appeal is prerequisite to exercise of appellate jurisdiction).
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wilkins v. Perez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkins-v-perez-ca5-2001.