Wilkins v. Hudson

Fourth Circuit

Wilkins v. Hudson

51 F. App'x 423

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 27, 2002·No. No. 02-2039·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael D. Wilkins and Edward F. Hodges appeal the district court’s order [424] denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Wilkins v. Hudson, No. CA-02-398 (E.D.Va. Aug. 6, 2002). In light of this disposition, we deny Hudson’s motion to dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Michael D. Wilkins and Edward F. Hodges appeal the district court’s order [424] denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Wilkins v. Hudson, No. CA-02-398 (E.D.Va. Aug. 6, 2002). In light of this disposition, we deny Hudson’s motion to dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Wilkins v. Hudson, 51 F. App'x 423 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

51 F. App'x 423 (Wilkins v. Hudson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related