Wilkins v. Darlington County
This text of Wilkins v. Darlington County (Wilkins v. Darlington County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7758
EDWARD EARL WILKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DARLINGTON COUNTY; DARLINGTON COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT AND PAROLE; SUSAN B CLIMMONS, Probation Officer; NICKIE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (2:07-cv-03317-GRA)
Submitted: March 27, 2008 Decided: April 3, 2008
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Edward Earl Wilkins appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
without prejudice Wilkins’ action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2000). In his informal appellate brief, Wilkins failed to
challenge the district court’s reasons supporting the denial of
relief. Accordingly, Wilkins has waived appellate review of those
issues. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (“The Court will limit its review to
the issues raised in the informal brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wilkins v. Darlington County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkins-v-darlington-county-ca4-2008.