Wilkins v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.

343 N.E.2d 768, 38 N.Y.2d 758, 381 N.Y.S.2d 51, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2366
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 2, 1975·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum. A prior court’s dismissal of the negligence claim on the merits, in this instance by a Federal court which under Federal procedure dismissed on the merits, precludes the plaintiff from litigating the unseaworthiness claim in [760] another court (cf. De Coss v Turner & Blanchard, 267 NY 207; see Restatement, Judgments, § 63, Comment b, Illustration 4; §§ 64-65).

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilkins v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 343 N.E.2d 768, 38 N.Y.2d 758, 381 N.Y.S.2d 51, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2366 (N.Y. 1975).

343 N.E.2d 768 (Wilkins v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Browning Debenture Holders' Committee v. DASA Corp.
454 F. Supp. 88 (S.D. New York, 1978)
Weisz v. Levitt
59 A.D.2d 1002 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)