Wilkins-Ricks Co. v. . Dalrymple
176 S.E. 750, 207 N.C. 860, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 515
Opinion
No reversible error in the trial of the cause has been made to appear; hence, the verdict and judgment will be upheld. Evidence of the account was competent, not only in corroboration of plaintiff’s testimony to which it was limited, but also as tending to show the consideration for the note. Bowman v. Blankenship, 165 N. C., 519, 81 S. E., 746.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilkins-Ricks Co. v. . Dalrymple, 176 S.E. 750, 207 N.C. 860, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 515 (N.C. 1934).
176 S.E. 750 (Wilkins-Ricks Co. v. . Dalrymple) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bowman v. . Blankenship
81 S.E. 746 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1914)