Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Wilkins-Ricks Co. v. . Dalrymple

Wilkins-Ricks Co. v. . Dalrymple

176 S.E. 750, 207 N.C. 860, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 515
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 31, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 176 S.E. 750 (Wilkins-Ricks Co. v. . Dalrymple) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilkins-Ricks Co. v. . Dalrymple, 176 S.E. 750, 207 N.C. 860, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 515 (N.C. 1934).

Opinion

Per Oukiam.

No reversible error in the trial of the cause has been made to appear; hence, the verdict and judgment will be upheld. Evidence of the account was competent, not only in corroboration of plaintiff’s testimony to which it was limited, but also as tending to show the consideration for the note. Bowman v. Blankenship, 165 N. C., 519, 81 S. E., 746.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowman v. . Blankenship
81 S.E. 746 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 S.E. 750, 207 N.C. 860, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkins-ricks-co-v-dalrymple-nc-1934.