Wilkins, Louis Oneal v. State
Opinion
Order entered May 9, 2013
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00333-CR
LOUIS ONEAL WILKINS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 401-80751-2011
ORDER
Appellant is represented by counsel; therefore, appellant’s pro se motion presents nothing
for review and is hereby DENIED. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981).
Moreover, any motion for a bond hearing must be directed to the trial court. See TEX. CRIM.
PROC. CODE ANN. art. 44.04 (West 2006).
/s/ DAVID LEWIS
JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilkins, Louis Oneal v. State (Wilkins, Louis Oneal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.