Wilkey v. State

701 S.E.2d 206, 305 Ga. App. 798, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2895, 2010 Ga. App. LEXIS 815
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 1, 2010
DocketA10A1297
StatusPublished

This text of 701 S.E.2d 206 (Wilkey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilkey v. State, 701 S.E.2d 206, 305 Ga. App. 798, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2895, 2010 Ga. App. LEXIS 815 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant Kay Forrest Wilkey appeals his conviction for being a party to the crime of selling cocaine. In his sole enumeration of error, Wilkey argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction.

For a criminal conviction on appeal, “ ‘the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ” Adams v. State, 255 Ga. 356, 356-357 (338 SE2d 860) (1986) (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307, 319 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979)).

So viewed, the record shows that on November 8, 2006, in Gordon County the Calhoun Police Department sent out an informant to purchase narcotics. The informant drove to the area of McConnell Road where two men approached and entered her car. The informant identified Wilkey as the man who sat in the front seat and asked her what she needed. The informant requested some “hard,” referring to crack cocaine, and Wilkey said he could get it. Wilkey then directed the informant to turn the car around and drive toward a dealer walking up the road. The informant pulled up to the dealer and Wilkey asked him for the drugs. The informant gave money to Wilkey who handed it to the dealer. The dealer in turn handed the crack rock to Wilkey who handed it to the informant. Wilkey then got out of the car and walked in the direction of the dealer.

“Under OCGA § 16-2-21, one who intentionally aids and abets *799 in the commission of a crime is a party to the crime and may be convicted of the commission of the crime.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Cooper v. State, 265 Ga. App. 137, 138 (592 SE2d 908) (2004). Consequently, there is sufficient evidence in the record for the jury to find Wilkey guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of selling cocaine.

Decided September 1, 2010. Christopher G. Paul, for appellant. T. Joseph Campbell, District Attorney, Elizabeth M. York, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Ellington and Doyle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Virginia
443 U.S. 307 (Supreme Court, 1979)
Cooper v. State
592 S.E.2d 908 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2004)
Adams v. State
338 S.E.2d 860 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
701 S.E.2d 206, 305 Ga. App. 798, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2895, 2010 Ga. App. LEXIS 815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkey-v-state-gactapp-2010.