Wilkesbarre Realty Co. v. Hall

126 N.Y.S. 411
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 5, 1911
StatusPublished

This text of 126 N.Y.S. 411 (Wilkesbarre Realty Co. v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilkesbarre Realty Co. v. Hall, 126 N.Y.S. 411 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from so much of an order opening her default in the Municipal Court as “provides that the motion to open her default should be denied in the event that the amount of the judgment is not deposited” in the Municipal Court.

This court has held that by virtue of the provisions of section 25 G of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, c. 580) the court may, upon an application to open a default, require the defendant either to give an undertaking or deposit the amount of the judgment. Clement v. White’s Express Co., 120 N. Y. Supp. 752.

The court in the case at bar did simply what the Municipal Court act gave it authority to do, and the claim that it was an unjust requirement and a hardship imposed upon the defendant has no legal force. The appeal is from an order opening a default, which is not appealable. Section 257, Municipal Court Act.

Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clement v. White's Express Co.
120 N.Y.S. 752 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 N.Y.S. 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkesbarre-realty-co-v-hall-nyappterm-1911.