Wilkes v. Tennessee Chemical Co.

131 S.E. 192, 34 Ga. App. 672, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 473
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1925
Docket16813
StatusPublished

This text of 131 S.E. 192 (Wilkes v. Tennessee Chemical Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilkes v. Tennessee Chemical Co., 131 S.E. 192, 34 Ga. App. 672, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 473 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The court did' not err in striking the answer of the defendant as amended, nor in thereafter awarding judgment in fay;or of the plaintiff for the principal, interest, and attorney’s fees sued for.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur. Hill & McElvey, Butch Wilkes, M. A. Warren, for plaintiff in error. Pope & Bennet, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 S.E. 192, 34 Ga. App. 672, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkes-v-tennessee-chemical-co-gactapp-1925.