Wilkes v. Rogers

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 66

Opinion

And they held, therefore, that, where the court below had set aside a master’s report upon matters to which exceptions were hot taken, and required further proof, that the order was ' erroneous, and could not be made even in a case where infants were concerned, if they have a guardian to protect their rights, and the order was reversed accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilkes v. Rogers, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 66 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 66 (Wilkes v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.