Wilkes v. Rogers
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 66
This text of 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 66 (Wilkes v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wilkes v. Rogers, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 66 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).
Opinion
And they held, therefore, that, where the court below had set aside a master’s report upon matters to which exceptions were hot taken, and required further proof, that the order was ' erroneous, and could not be made even in a case where infants were concerned, if they have a guardian to protect their rights, and the order was reversed accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkes-v-rogers-nycterr-1799.