Wilkes v. Pope

60 S.E. 823, 4 Ga. App. 36, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 190
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 16, 1908·No. 886·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. The transferee of a negotiable paper who receives it before it is due can not be affected by any agreement or understanding between other parties to the paper, unless notice of such agreement or understanding is brought home to the transferee. Wooten v. Inman, 33 Ga. 41.

2. If A signs his name to a blank note and delivers it to B, designating the payee to be filled in the note by B, A constitutes B his agent for that purpose, and A will be bound to a bona fide holder of the note who became such before maturity, although B violated the private understanding between A and himself with reference to the note. Moody v. Threlkeld, 13 Ga. 55.

3. The testimony of one whose name appears as the maker of a negotiable note, that he signed it as surety, with the understanding that another • should sign as maker before the delivery of the note to the payee, the latter having no notice of such understanding, does not support a plea of non est factum, or constitute a defense as against a bona fide transferee for value before maturity. Cleghorn v. Robison, 8 Ga. 559; Benson v. Abbott, 95 Ga. 75 (22 S. E. 127). Judgment affirmed.

Bari damp, George B. Davis, for plaintiff in error. Peyton L. Wade, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilkes v. Pope, 60 S.E. 823, 4 Ga. App. 36, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 190 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

60 S.E. 823 (Wilkes v. Pope) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Northcutt v. Crowe
158 S.E.2d 318 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Savannah Bank & Trust Co. v. Groover
192 S.E. 49 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
L. & N. W. R. R. v. Union Indemnity Co.
124 So. 682 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1929)
Dorris v. Farmers & Merchants Bank
96 S.E. 450 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Hancock v. Empire Cotton Oil Co.
86 S.E. 434 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)