Wilkes v. Hotchkiss

5 Johns. 360
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1810·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the ordinary affidavit of merits, it is requisite that the party should state, as to his being advised by counsel; but here the whole merits are disclosed by the affidavit, and the court, on the face of it, can judge whether the defendant has a defence on the merits or not. We grant the motion on payment of costs, and with liberty to the plaintiff to change the venue to any county he may think proper.

Rule granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilkes v. Hotchkiss, 5 Johns. 360 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

5 Johns. 360 (Wilkes v. Hotchkiss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sneaghan v. Briggs
1 Wilson 75 (Indiana Super. Ct., 1871)
Brittan v. Peabody
4 Hill & Den. 61 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1842)