Wilkes v. Anderson

Fourth Circuit

Wilkes v. Anderson

226 F. App'x 268

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 15, 2007·No. No. 07-6353·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Shone Edward Wilkes, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilkes v. Anderson, No. 5:04-cv-01304, 2007 WL 580000 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [269]*269presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Shone Edward Wilkes, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilkes v. Anderson, No. 5:04-cv-01304, 2007 WL 580000 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [269]*269presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Wilkes v. Anderson, 226 F. App'x 268 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

226 F. App'x 268 (Wilkes v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related