Wilkes v. Alarcon

547 F. App'x 359
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 9, 2013
DocketNo. 13-6967
StatusPublished

This text of 547 F. App'x 359 (Wilkes v. Alarcon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilkes v. Alarcon, 547 F. App'x 359 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James D. Wilkes appeals the district court’s order adopting as modified the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wilkes v. Alarcon, No. 1:11-cv-00131IMK-JSK, 2013 WL 2237861 (N.D.W.Va. May 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
547 F. App'x 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkes-v-alarcon-ca4-2013.