Wilkerson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wilkerson v. State

432 So. 2d 59, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 28974

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilkerson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 215 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 25, 1983·No. No. 82-1901·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. We note in passing that appellant’s sentence appears to be illegal under the rationale of Villery v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1980). If appellant wishes to raise this issue, he may do so by filing in the trial court a motion for post-conviction relief.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and GRIMES and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. We note in passing that appellant’s sentence appears to be illegal under the rationale of Villery v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1980). If appellant wishes to raise this issue, he may do so by filing in the trial court a motion for post-conviction relief.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and GRIMES and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Wilkerson v. State, 432 So. 2d 59, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 28974 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

432 So. 2d 59 (Wilkerson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related