WILKERSON v. KELSEY
This text of WILKERSON v. KELSEY (WILKERSON v. KELSEY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
LEWIS WILKERSON, Civil Action No. 20-1110(RMB)
Plaintiff
v. OPINION
WARDEN DAVID KELSEY, et al.,
Defendants
BUMB, District Judge
On January 31, 2020, Plaintiff, confined in the Atlantic County Justice Facility in Mays Landing, New Jersey, filed this civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) On February 11, 2020, legal mail sent to Plaintiff by the Court was returned without a forwarding address. (ECF No. 2.) I. DISCUSSION Local Civil Rule 10.1(a) provides, in relevant part:
unrepresented parties must advise the Court of any change in their . . . address within seven days of being apprised of such change by filing a notice of said change with the Clerk. Failure to file a notice of change may result in the imposition of sanctions by the Court.
Dismissing a Plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice is an appropriate remedy for noncompliance with this rule. See Archie v. Dept. of Corr., Civ. No. 12-2466 (RBK/JS), 2015 WL 333299, at *1 (D.N.J. Jan. 23, 2015) (collecting cases). Mail sent to Plaintiff’s last known address was returned. To date, Plaintiff has not informed the Court of his new address. II. CONCLUSION
The Court will dismiss this case without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 10.1 An appropriate order follows.
Dated: April 2, 2020 s/Renée Marie Bumb RENÉE MARIE BUMB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
WILKERSON v. KELSEY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkerson-v-kelsey-njd-2020.