Wilkerson v. Gordon

48 Ark. 360
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 15, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 48 Ark. 360 (Wilkerson v. Gordon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilkerson v. Gordon, 48 Ark. 360 (Ark. 1886).

Opinion

Cockrill, C. J.

The requirement of the statute for authenticating claims against the estates of deceased persons is not fulfilled by an affidavit made at some period in the-lifetime of the decedent, to the efiect that he was justly indebted to the affiant in a sum stated, and that nothing had. been paid or delivered toward the satisfaction of the-demand.

Such an affidavit might be true when made, but not true-if applied to the facts existing at the date of the debtor’s, death.

The affidavit required is the foundation for legal proceedings against the estate in the probate court, and the-claimant is not entitled to participate in the assets without' it. Birnie v. Imboden, 14 Ark., 237; Walker v. Byers, ib., 246; Alter v. Kinsworthy, 30 ib., 756.

But there is no estate to proceed against nor anything-over which the probate court can assume jurisdiction until, the death of the debtor, and prior to that time no steps-can be legally taken in the matter-.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Acker v. Watkins
100 S.W.2d 78 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1936)
McIlroy Banking Co. v. Dickson
50 S.W. 868 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1899)
Estate of Le Clerc
5 Coffey 297 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 Ark. 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkerson-v-gordon-ark-1886.