Wilkerson v. Davis

256 S.W. 944
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 10, 1923
DocketNo. 6736.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 256 S.W. 944 (Wilkerson v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilkerson v. Davis, 256 S.W. 944 (Tex. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

BAUGH, J.

It is admitted by both appellants and appellees that the appeal bond in this case was not filed within the time prescribed by article 2084, Vernon’s Sayles’ Revised Civil Statutes 1914. Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for that reason;. and the appellants virtually admit in their reply that such motion is good. The courts have repeatedly held in such case the appeal must be dismissed. See Harvey v. Cummings et al., 62 Tex. 186; Fryer v. Headlee et al. (Tex. Civ. App.) 218 S. W. 654. Motion to dismiss appeal is granted.

In their reply appellants ask permission, in case the appeal is dismissed, to withdraw the statement of facts. Under rule 62 of the Court of Civil Appeals (142 S. W. xvi) an appellant is entitled to such, permission, unless the record contains original papers belonging to the adverse party. No such papers appear in this case, and the leave requested is therefore granted to appellants by the court.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pinkston v. Farmers State Bank of Center
201 S.W.2d 595 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 S.W. 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkerson-v-davis-texapp-1923.