Wilkerson v. County of Chesterfield

Fourth Circuit

Wilkerson v. County of Chesterfield

668 F. App'x 37

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 19, 2016·No. No. 16-6269·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Norman 'Kevin Wilkerson appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wilkerson v. Cty. of Chesterfield, No. 2:15-cv-00531-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 23, 2016; Jan. 28, 2016). We deny Wilkerson’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Norman 'Kevin Wilkerson appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wilkerson v. Cty. of Chesterfield, No. 2:15-cv-00531-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 23, 2016; Jan. 28, 2016). We deny Wilkerson’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Wilkerson v. County of Chesterfield, 668 F. App'x 37 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

668 F. App'x 37 (Wilkerson v. County of Chesterfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related