Wilkerson v. Chadd

Indiana Supreme Court

Wilkerson v. Chadd

14 Ind. 448

DecidedJune 11, 1860

StatusPublished

This text of 14 Ind. 448 (Wilkerson v. Chadd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilkerson v. Chadd, 14 Ind. 448 (Ind. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Suit on note. Answer, averring that the note was given for lands for which an imperfect deed was executed, which is referred to and made a part of the answer, and that the vendor had no title to a part, &c., of said land, &c. Demurrer sustained to the answer. Judgment for plaintiff.

The deed exhibited does not sustain the averments in the answer. The demurrer was properly sustained. Small v. Reeves, at this term

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Suit on note. Answer, averring that the note was given for lands for which an imperfect deed was executed, which is referred to and made a part of the answer, and that the vendor had no title to a part, &c., of said land, &c. Demurrer sustained to the answer. Judgment for plaintiff.

The deed exhibited does not sustain the averments in the answer. The demurrer was properly sustained. Small v. Reeves, at this term

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 Ind. 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilkerson-v-chadd-ind-1860.