Wilkening v. US Department of Education

District Court, D. Minnesota·Decided December 29, 2021·No. 0:20-cv-01574·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Christopher Wilkening, Civ. No. 20-1574 (PAM/ECW)

Plaintiff,

v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

US Department of Education, Justice Department Debt Collection Services, and US Department of Education – National Payment Ctr/Fed Loan Servicing,

Defendants.

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright dated December 13, 2021. (Docket No. 6.) The R&R recommends that Plaintiff Christopher Wilkening’s Complaint be dismissed without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute. This Court must review de novo any portion of an R&R to which specific objections are made, but in the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R only for clear error. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(b); see also Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (noting that district court need only review un-objected-to R&R for clear error). The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds no error, clear or otherwise, in the Magistrate Judge’s reasoning. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The R&R (Docket No. 6) is ADOPTED; and

2. The Complaint (Docket No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: Wednesday, December 29, 2021 s/ Paul A. Magnuson Paul A. Magnuson United States District Court Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilkening v. US Department of Education, (mnd 2021).

Wilkening v. US Department of Education (Wilkening v. US Department of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related