Wilke v. Harrison Bros.
This text of 30 A. 1125 (Wilke v. Harrison Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In view of the testimony before the jury there was no error in refusing to affirm either of defendants’ points recited in the first and second specifications respectively. The case appears to have been carefully tried and submitted to the jury with instructions which, with the exception of said points, were satisfactory to both parties. We find nothing in the record that would justify us in sustaining either of the specifications. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 A. 1125, 166 Pa. 202, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilke-v-harrison-bros-pa-1895.