Wilke v. Harrison Bros.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Wilke v. Harrison Bros.

30 A. 1125, 166 Pa. 202, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1176

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 21, 1895·No. Appeal, No. 472·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In view of the testimony before the jury there was no error in refusing to affirm either of defendants’ points recited in the first and second specifications respectively. The case appears to have been carefully tried and submitted to the jury with instructions which, with the exception of said points, were satisfactory to both parties. We find nothing in the record that would justify us in sustaining either of the specifications. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

In view of the testimony before the jury there was no error in refusing to affirm either of defendants’ points recited in the first and second specifications respectively. The case appears to have been carefully tried and submitted to the jury with instructions which, with the exception of said points, were satisfactory to both parties. We find nothing in the record that would justify us in sustaining either of the specifications. Judgment affirmed.

Wilke v. Harrison Bros., 30 A. 1125, 166 Pa. 202, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1176 (Pa. 1895).

Pincite

30 A. 1125 (Wilke v. Harrison Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related