Wilinski v. Township of Haddon

153 A. 97, 9 N.J. Misc. 140, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 466
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 21, 1931·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The relators have a contract to purchase a triangle bounded north by Collings avenue, west by Calvert avenue, and southeast by Crescent Boulevard, in the township of Haddon, and wish to use the property for a gasoline and oil-filling station. Their application for a permit was denied and they come to this court to compel the issuance of such permit. The premises are not affected by any true zoning ordinance. However, it appears that there is still in force an ordinance of 1920 which forbids any public or private garage within two hundred feet of a church; and the case shows that there is a church immediately across the street from this tract of land and within two hundred feet of it. It has been!held by this court that a filling station such as the relators desire to install is within the meaning of the word “garage.” Northern New Jersey Oil Co. v. Board, 142 Atl. Rep. 557; Peck v. Newark, 142 Id. 558; 6 N. J. Mis. R. 698.

The rule to show cause will accordingly be discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilinski v. Township of Haddon, 153 A. 97, 9 N.J. Misc. 140, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 466 (N.J. 1931).

153 A. 97 (Wilinski v. Township of Haddon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wyatt v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
322 P.2d 137 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1958)