Wilhy Harpo v. Mordena Bolt
This text of Wilhy Harpo v. Mordena Bolt (Wilhy Harpo v. Mordena Bolt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ April 10, 2015
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A15D0315. WILHY HARPO v. MORDENA BOLT et al.
On October 23, 2014, the trial court entered an order denying Wilhy Harpo’s request to file a notice of appeal. On January 22, 2014, Harpo filed an application for discretionary appeal in the Supreme Court, which later transferred the matter here. An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in compliance therewith. See Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Harpo filed his application 91 days after the trial court’s order. Therefore, the application is untimely and it is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 04/10/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wilhy Harpo v. Mordena Bolt, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilhy-harpo-v-mordena-bolt-gactapp-2015.