Wilhoite v. Shinseki
This text of Wilhoite v. Shinseki (Wilhoite v. Shinseki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 13-7110 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 08/05/2013
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________
H.D. WILHOITE, Claimant-Appellant, v. Eric K. Shinseki, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee. __________________________
2013-7110 __________________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 10-2018, Judge Lawrence B. Hagel. __________________________
ON MOTION __________________________
ORDER H.D. Wilhoite moves for the court to waive the filing fee and for an extension of time to file the appellant’s opening brief. We note that the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims permitted Wilhoite to proceed in forma pauperis. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3), Wilhoite may proceed in forma pauperis on appeal without further Case: 13-7110 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 08/05/2013
WILHOITE v. SHINSEKI 2
authorization. The court also notes that Mr. Wilhoite filed his brief on July 19, 2013. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to waive the filing fee is moot.
(2) The motion for an extension of time is moot.
FOR THE COURT
/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk
s21
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wilhoite v. Shinseki, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilhoite-v-shinseki-cafc-2013.