Wilhite v. Littlelight
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
TAMMY WILHITE, CV 19-20-BLG-SPW Plaintiff, vs. ORDER ADOPTING . MAGISTRATE’S FINDINGS PAUL LITTLELIGHT, LANA AND RECOMMENDATIONS THREE IRONS, HENRY PRETTY ON TOP, SHANNON BRADLEY, and CARLA CATOLSTER, Defendants.
Before the Court are United States Magistrate Judge Timothy Cavan’s Findings and Recommendations, filed on February 3, 2023. (Doc. 77). Judge Cavan recommends this Court grant with leave to amend Defendants Paul Littlelight, Lana Three Irons, Henry Pretty On Top, Shannon Bradley, and Carla Catolster’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 58). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the parties were required to file written objections within 14 days of the filing of the Findings and Recommendations. No objections were filed. When neither party objects, this Court reviews the findings and recommendations for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore
Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been
committed.” United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000). After
reviewing the Findings and Recommendations, this Court does not find Judge Cavan committed clear error. IT IS ORDERED that United States Magistrate Judge Timothy Cavan’s
Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 77) are ADOPTED IN FULL.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss be
GRANTED with leave to amend.
ad DATED this -2day of February, 2023.
Lice leh tttn SUSAN P. WATTERS United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilhite v. Littlelight (Wilhite v. Littlelight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.