Wilhelmina Williams A/K/A Wilhelmina Lister v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 23, 2001
Docket13-00-00451-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Wilhelmina Williams A/K/A Wilhelmina Lister v. State (Wilhelmina Williams A/K/A Wilhelmina Lister v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilhelmina Williams A/K/A Wilhelmina Lister v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-00-451-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

__________________________________________________________________

WILHELMINA WILLIAMS A/K/A WILHELMINA LISTER , Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.

__________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 117th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Dorsey, Hinojosa, and Rodriguez

Opinion by Justice Dorsey



Wilhelmina Williams was convicted by a jury of two counts of assault on a public officer. The court sentenced her to five years confinement, and suspended her confinement and placed her on community supervision for five years. She wishes to appeal her conviction and sentence and has filed a timely notice of appeal with this court.

Williams' court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which counsel has concluded that an appeal would be wholly frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel provided a copy of this brief to Williams, and she has exercised her right to file a pro se brief in support of her appeal. We have thoroughly reviewed the record as mandated by Anders and we agree with counsel that any appeal of this matter would be wholly frivolous. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744-45 (requiring the appellate court to conduct a full examination of all proceedings to determine whether it agrees with counsel's determination that any appeal would be wholly frivolous). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

______________________________

J. BONNER DORSEY,

Justice

Do not publish .

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3(b).

Opinion delivered and filed

this 23rd day of August, 2001.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wilhelmina Williams A/K/A Wilhelmina Lister v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilhelmina-williams-aka-wilhelmina-lister-v-state-texapp-2001.