Wilhelm v. Warden
This text of 120 A.2d 195 (Wilhelm v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
WILHELM
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Before BRUNE, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, HENDERSON and HAMMOND, JJ.
*625 HENDERSON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is an application for leave to appeal from a denial of a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner was convicted in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County of carrying a deadly weapon and sentenced to two years in the House of Correction. Petitioner contends that no crime was established by the evidence, that there was an illegal search and seizure, that he was not afforded a reasonable time to prepare his defense, and that he was not arraigned. None of these contentions can be made on habeas corpus, as we have repeatedly held. Petitioner was represented by counsel, and the docket entries show that he submitted under a plea of not guilty and waived a jury trial.
Application denied, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 A.2d 195, 209 Md. 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilhelm-v-warden-md-2001.