Wilhelm v. Miley
5 Serg. & Rawle 137
Opinion
without hearing the counsel for the defend-
ants, expressed their opinion, that the defendants should have been called before the Court of Common Pleas to settle their accounts, before an action at common law could be supported, and therefore, the evidence was properly rejected.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilhelm v. Miley, 5 Serg. & Rawle 137 (Pa. 1819).
5 Serg. & Rawle 137 (Wilhelm v. Miley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pollak v. Gregory
9 Bosw. 116 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1861)
Gray v. Bell
4 Watts 410 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1835)