Wilfredo Quinones-Velazquez v. James Maroulis

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilfredo Quinones-Velazquez v. James Maroulis. Read the opinion of the Court — 677 F. App'x 801
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 8, 2017·No. 16-2697·Unpublished

Opinion

NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________

No. 16-2697 ___________

WILFREDO QUINONES-VELAZQUEZ; ELIZABETH MADRID HENAO, Appellants

v.

JAMES PETER MAROULIS ____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 1-15-cv-01678) District Judge: Honorable Christopher C. Conner ____________________________________

___________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION ___________

It has come to the Court’s attention that a typographical error appears in the

opinion which was filed on February 3, 2017 with respect to the quote appearing on page

3 of the opinion in the first sentence of subsection II. As such, the opinion is amended as

follows:

A plaintiff’s burden of satisfying the amount in controversy required for diversity

jurisdiction “is not especially onerous.” Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Steven & Ricci

Inc., 835 F.3d 388, 395 (3d Cir. 2016). As the error is typographical in nature, the original filing date of the opinion and

judgment will not be altered.

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Dated: February 8, 2017 JK/cc: Wilfredo Quinones-Velazquez Elizabeth Madrid Henao Jeffrey G. Velander, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilfredo Quinones-Velazquez v. James Maroulis, (3d Cir. 2017).

Wilfredo Quinones-Velazquez v. James Maroulis (Wilfredo Quinones-Velazquez v. James Maroulis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related