Wilfred Welsh v. McNeil & Elliott

162 A.3d 135, 2017 WL 2825814, 2017 D.C. App. LEXIS 147
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided June 29, 2017·No. 15-CV-524 & 15-CV-559 w stamp·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Opinion by Associate Judge Gliekman, concurring in part and dissenting in part, with whom Associate Judges Beckwith and McLeese join in Parts I, II and III B, at page 139.

Concurring opinion by Associate Judge Beckwith with whom Associate Judge McLeese joins, at page 157.

Before Gliekman, Beckwith, and McLeese, Associate Judges.

Per Curiam

Wilfred Welsh, a member of the Chaplin Woods Homeowners Association (“HOA”), sued fellow HOA members Beverly McNeil and Alvin Elliott (the “McNeils”) on the ground that they had leased out their home in violation of the HOA’s bylaws. The McNeils brought counterclaims under the Federal Fair Housing Act1 and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act.2 The trial court granted summary judgment against Mr. Welsh on the [139]*139ground that he lacked standing and against the McNeils on the merits. Mr. Welsh and the McNeils now appeal these respective rulings.

As to Mr. Welsh’s claims, we reverse the judgment of the trial court for the reasons stated in Judge Beckwith’s opinion. As to the McNeils’ counterclaims, we reverse the trial court’s judgment for the reasons stated in Judge Glickman’s opinion. The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with these opinions.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilfred Welsh v. McNeil & Elliott, 162 A.3d 135, 2017 WL 2825814, 2017 D.C. App. LEXIS 147 (D.C. 2017).

162 A.3d 135 (Wilfred Welsh v. McNeil & Elliott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related