Wiley v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wiley v. State

271 A.D.2d 1046

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 12, 1947

DocketClaim No. 24075; Claim No. 24076; Claim No. 24077

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 1046 (Wiley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wiley v. State, 271 A.D.2d 1046 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeals from judgments rendered by the Court of Claims which dismissed each of the claimant’s claims after a consolidated trial. The claims were in negligence. Claimants suffered injuries and damage when an automobile in which they were riding, and operated by one of them, collided with a bridge owned and maintained by the Boston and Maine Railroad Company for vehicular traffic over and above its railroad tracks,, Claimants were traveling upon a State highway which led to the bridge. The conclusion of the Court of Claims that the accident wherein claimants suffered damage was caused solely by the negligence of the claimant driver is amply supported by. the evidence. Judgments affirmed, without costs. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Brewster, J., taking no part. [See 272 App. Div. 846.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeals from judgments rendered by the Court of Claims which dismissed each of the claimant’s claims after a consolidated trial. The claims were in negligence. Claimants suffered injuries and damage when an automobile in which they were riding, and operated by one of them, collided with a bridge owned and maintained by the Boston and Maine Railroad Company for vehicular traffic over and above its railroad tracks,, Claimants were traveling upon a State highway which led to the bridge. The conclusion of the Court of Claims that the accident wherein claimants suffered damage was caused solely by the negligence of the claimant driver is amply supported by. the evidence. Judgments affirmed, without costs. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Brewster, J., taking no part. [See 272 App. Div. 846.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 1046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiley-v-state-nyappdiv-1947.