Wiley v. State

475 S.W.3d 675, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1251, 2014 WL 5843482
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 12, 2014·No. ED 100116·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Todd Wiley , appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule [676]*67624.0351 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Brooks v. State, 242 S.W.3d 705, 708 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wiley v. State, 475 S.W.3d 675, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1251, 2014 WL 5843482 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

475 S.W.3d 675 (Wiley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brooks v. State
242 S.W.3d 705 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2008)