Wiley v. State

386 S.E.2d 523, 192 Ga. App. 808, 1989 Ga. App. LEXIS 1187, 1989 WL 155066
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 6, 1989
DocketA89A1365
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 386 S.E.2d 523 (Wiley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wiley v. State, 386 S.E.2d 523, 192 Ga. App. 808, 1989 Ga. App. LEXIS 1187, 1989 WL 155066 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

Sognier, Judge.

Terry Wiley was indicted on charges of burglary and rape. He was convicted of burglary and attempted rape and appeals.

1. Appellant contends the trial court erred by admitting a tape recorded statement made by appellant to the police without excising those portions of the tape in which appellant discussed getting anc using illegal drugs. “We find no error. ‘It is no valid ground of objecl tion to the admission in evidence of an incriminatory statement oi confession made by the accused in a criminal case that the language indicated that the accused had committed also another and separatj offense.’ [Cit.]” Berryhill v. State, 235 Ga. 549, 551-552 (6) (221 SE2d 185) (1975).

2. Appellant contends the trial court erred by charging the jur| as to attempted rape because the evidence authorized the jury to cor sider only rape or nothing at all. However, the victim testified at tl trial that while appellant’s co-defendant did rape her, appellant faile| to penetrate the victim when he climbed on top of her and wer “through the motions of the” act because the victim was able to g(j [809]*809appellant off her “to the point that he didn’t [succeed] to what he was doing . . . .” Such evidence is, to say the least, some evidence of attempted rape, and where there is any evidence, however slight, upon a particular point, it is not error for the court to charge the law in relation to that issue. Cole v. State, 186 Ga. App. 243, 244 (3) (366 SE2d 844) (1988).

Decided September 6, 1989 Rehearing denied September 18, 1989. Dan T. Pressley, Sr., for appellant. Michael G. Crawford, District Attorney, E. Jay McCollum, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Banke, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brenneman v. State
407 S.E.2d 93 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Day v. State
399 S.E.2d 741 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
386 S.E.2d 523, 192 Ga. App. 808, 1989 Ga. App. LEXIS 1187, 1989 WL 155066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiley-v-state-gactapp-1989.