Wiley v. State
This text of 81 So. 343 (Wiley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is no merit in the contention that Morgan could not testify as to the value of the whisky in Louisville. This was brought out by the defendant on cross-examination as to the witness’ judgment as to what the whisky was worth in Alabama.
There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 So. 343, 17 Ala. App. 7, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiley-v-state-alactapp-1919.