Wiley v. Man-a-to-wah
6 Kan. 111
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The errors alleged in this case are precisely the same as those decided in the case of Wiley v. Keokuk, ante, 94, with this exception; the question as to the sufficiency of the cause of challenge of the juror does not arise in this case.
For the reasons given in that case, the judgment in this case is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wiley v. Man-a-to-wah, 6 Kan. 111 (kan 1870).
6 Kan. 111 (Wiley v. Man-a-to-wah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stevenson v. Christie
42 S.W. 418 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1897)
Keokuk v. Ulam
38 P. 1080 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1896)