Wiley v. Hess

Fourth Circuit

Wiley v. Hess

186 F. App'x 407

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 20, 2006·No. No. 06-6435·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Carl Edward Wiley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wiley v. North Carolina, No. l:06-cv-00038, 2006 WL 456491 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Carl Edward Wiley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wiley v. North Carolina, No. l:06-cv-00038, 2006 WL 456491 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Wiley v. Hess, 186 F. App'x 407 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

186 F. App'x 407 (Wiley v. Hess) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related