Wiley v. Arnoux

The Superior Court of New York City

Wiley v. Arnoux

60 How. Pr. 137

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedNovember 15, 1880

StatusPublished

This text of 60 How. Pr. 137 (Wiley v. Arnoux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wiley v. Arnoux, 60 How. Pr. 137 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, J.

In the case of Lewis agt. Farrell, decided at this term of the court, it was held that before the additional chapters of the new Code went into operation it was necessary for a plaintiff residing in another county bringing an action in this court to file security for costs, but that the Code, as amended,-had changed the law on this subject. The order appealed from was made before the change in the law occurred. It was correct as the law then was, and should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements. So ordered.

Spies, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

In the case of Lewis agt. Farrell, decided at this term of the court, it was held that before the additional chapters of the new Code went into operation it was necessary for a plaintiff residing in another county bringing an action in this court to file security for costs, but that the Code, as amended,-had changed the law on this subject. The order appealed from was made before the change in the law occurred. It was correct as the law then was, and should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements. So ordered.

Spies, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 How. Pr. 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiley-v-arnoux-nysuperctnyc-1880.